To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.

For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.


Sunday, July 21, 2013

The Change Questionnaire predicts change in hazardous tobacco and alcohol use

Assessing motivation for change is deemed an important step in the treatment process that allows further refinement of the intervention in motivational interviewing (MI) and brief MI adaptations (BMI). During MI (and BMI) sessions, motivation for change is expressed by the client as “change talk”, i.e. all statements inclined toward or away from change. We tested the predictive validity of the Change Questionnaire, a 12-item instrument assessing motivation to change, on hazardous tobacco and alcohol use.

As part of the baseline measurements for a randomized controlled trial on multi-substance BMI at Lausanne recruitment center (army conscription is mandatory in Switzerland for males at age 20, and thus provides a unique opportunity to address a non-clinical and largely representative sample of young men), 213 participants completed the questionnaire on tobacco and 95 on alcohol and were followed-up six months later. The overall Change Questionnaire score and its six sub-scales (Desire, Ability, Reasons, Need, Commitment, and Taking steps) were used as predictors of hazardous tobacco use (defined as daily smoking) and hazardous alcohol use (defined as more than one occasion with six standard drinks or more per month, and/or more than 21 standard drinks per week) in bivariate logistic regression models at follow-up.


Higher overall change scores were significant predictors of decreased risk for hazardous tobacco (odds ratio [OR]=0.83, p=0.046) and alcohol (OR=0.76, p=0.03) use. Several sub-dimensions were associated with the outcomes in bivariate analyses. Using a principal components analysis to reduce the number of predictors for multivariate models, we obtained two components. ‘Ability to change’ was strongly related to change in hazardous tobacco use, the second we interpreted as ‘Other change language dimensions’ and which was significantly related to change in hazardous alcohol use .


The present findings lend initial support for the predictive validity of the Change Questionnaire on hazardous tobacco and alcohol use, making it an interesting and potentially useful tool for assessing motivation to change among young males.

Read Full Abstract

Request Reprint E-Mail: