Aims

To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.

For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.

___________________________________________

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2006 Nov Vol 115(4) 807-814

Item Response Theory Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria for Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders in Adolescents: Implications for DSM-V.





Martin, Christopher S.: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, US
email: martincs@upmc.edu


Chung, Tammy: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, US

Kirisci, Levent: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences,, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, US

Langenbucher, James W.: Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, NJ, US


Abstract
Item response theory (IRT) has advantages over classical test theory in evaluating diagnostic criteria.

In this study, the authors used IRT to characterize the psychometric properties of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) alcohol and cannabis use disorder symptoms among 472 clinical adolescents.

For both substances, DSM-IV symptoms fit a model specifying a unidimensional latent trait of problem severity.

Threshold (severity) parameters did not distinguish abuse and dependence symptoms.

Abuse symptoms of legal problems and hazardous use, and dependence symptoms of tolerance, unsuccessful attempts to quit, and physical-psychological problems, showed relatively poor discrimination of problem severity.

There were gender differences in thresholds for hazardous use, legal problems, and physical-psychological problems.

The results illustrate limitations of DSM-IV criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders when applied to adolescents. The development process for the fifth edition (DSM-V) should be informed by statistical models such as those used in this study.