Aims

To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.

For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.

___________________________________________

Sunday, January 28, 2007

How Safe are Federal Regulations on Occupational Alcohol Use?


Journal of Public Health Policy (2006) 27, 389–404.

How Safe are Federal Regulations on Occupational Alcohol Use?

Jonathan Howland, Alissa Almeida, Damaris Rohsenow, Sara Minsky and Jacey Greece

Correspondence: Jacey Greece, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Talbot 2 West, Boston, MA 02118, USA. E-mail: jhowl@bu.edu

Abstract
Current US federal regulations on occupational alcohol use for safety-sensitive jobs do not account for impairment from low doses of alcohol and next day effects of heavy drinking.

Research on the effects of low doses of alcohol on neurocognitive and simulated occupational tasks suggests that the current per se level of these regulations is set too high. Research on the effects of heavy drinking on next-day neurocognitive and simulated occupational performance is mixed and suggests that further research is needed to determine the safety of current "bottle-to-throttle" times.

Although low-dose and residual drinking effects may pose low relative risk for occupational error, the aggregate contribution of these exposures to workplace problems may be substantial, given the number of people exposed.

full text (pdf)