Aims

To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.

For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.

___________________________________________

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research (OnlineEarly Articles).
12 February 2007
Multidimensionality of the Alcohol Withdrawal Symptom Checklist: A Factor Analysis of the Alcohol Withdrawal Symptom Checklist and CIWA-Ar





  • 1NIAAA Center for the Translational Neuroscience of Alcoholism, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; 2the Alcohol Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System (116-A), West Haven, Connecticut; 3the Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut; 4the St. Petersburg Regional Center of Addictions and Psychopharmacology, Pavlov State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia; and 5RTI International, Baltimore, Maryland
Reprint requests: Brian Pittman, Connecticut Mental Health Center, 34 Park Street, 3rd Floor CNRU, New Haven, CT 06519; Fax: 203-974-7662; E-mail: brian.pittman@yale.edu

Abstract

Background:

This study evaluated the factor structure of 2 scales for measuring the severity of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS): a self-rated scale, the Alcohol Withdrawal Symptoms Checklist (AWSC), and an observer-rated scale, the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment—Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar).

Methods:

Alcohol-dependent male inpatients [n=127, age: 43.0±9.7 (mean±SD) years] were recruited from an inpatient treatment unit. Both measures of AWS were assessed repeatedly during the initial week of sobriety in these patients. An exploratory factor analysis was applied to the data collected on the first study day.

Results:

Five independent factors accounted for 64% of total variance in the AWSC: autonomic arousal, depression, nausea and vomiting, alcohol craving, and tension/anxiety.

Three items (abdominal pain, hallucinations, confusion) could not be included in the analysis due to insufficient variance.

Three dimensions identified for the CIWA-Ar (autonomic arousal, nausea and vomiting, tension/anxiety) were also captured by the ASWC.

Total AWSC scores correlated well with total CIWA-Ar scores (r=0.72), supporting validity of the AWSC.

Lower correlations between total CIWA-Ar and the 5 factors (r=0.32–0.52) suggested that the CIWA-Ar and AWSC factors had discriminative value.

Conclusions:

Self-rated measures of AWS could play an important role in complementing observer-rated measures in clinical and research settings.

In this sample, the AWSC appeared to identify multiple dimensions of AWS with face validity for clinical relevance.