![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrmBpPz57ahUKNd1efAWVWf_VnBGkNmbz9vCcAq4hhUSyGJiC71f4AfpHsov_DwFW4TQJGkY3Xp9k80DULC3yRx5rsJKrtMXzmECcAEQlFf-ZXs2LgCNbZ-3zxvoEkns1kXMGS_-OPWL4/s200/JSAD.bmp)
Journal Stud. Alcohol Drugs 68: 519-528, 2007
There has been increasing recognition among alcohol treatment researchers that research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects can contribute to clinical outcomes, decrease study design sensitivity, and confound research findings.
The present study is an experimental investigation of two of the more salient components of the research assessment interview (i.e., frequency and comprehensiveness) and their effects on clinical outcomes (Part I: Alcohol Use and Related Consequences) and treatment participation (Part II: Treatment Engagement and Involvement).
Research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects were related significantly to alcohol use and related negative consequences, such that subjects assigned to the infrequent-brief research assessment exposure condition reported the poorest outcomes.
The research protocols used to study alcohol treatments have clinical efficacy and can alter the outcomes (e.g., alcohol use) under investigation. It is important for researchers to control/account for subject reactivity effects when conducting alcohol treatment outcome trials.
Accurate interpretation of data derived from clinical trials of alcohol treatments necessitates taking research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects into consideration.
Read Full Abstract
Request Reprint E-Mail: patrick.clifford@umdnj.edu
______________________________________________________________________