![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjkk2CyAfwP3C7wNMoO0W8OxLujDco3gG9iySOWllbSB2xEkI_skYxgNH0YND9WBs3uZDP9SS4CshfF6aT4gcmvSlUA6Y9DL5Z2_9Taiob9ChShHR8t9-dqbObXgOEh8xj8LyRiYNt3EJO3/s200/addiction.gif)
Previous research showed that consistently not responding to alcohol-related stimuli in a Go/No-Go training reduces drinking behavior. This study aimed to further examine the mechanisms underlying this Go/No-Go training effect.
Fifty-seven heavy drinkers were randomly assigned to two training conditions: In the beer/no-go condition, alcohol-related stimuli were always paired with a stopping response, while in the beer/go condition, participants always responded to alcohol-related stimuli. Participants were individually tested in a laboratory at Maastricht University.
Weekly alcohol intake, implicit attitudes toward beer, approach-avoidance action tendencies toward beer, and response inhibition were measured before and after the training.
Results showed a significant reduction in both implicit attitudes (p= .03) and alcohol intake (p= .02) in the beer/no-go condition, but not in the beer/go condition. There were no significant training effects on action tendencies or response inhibition.
Repeatedly stopping prepotent responses toward alcohol-related stimuli effectively reduces excessive alcohol use via a devaluation of alcohol-related stimuli rather than via increased inhibitory control over alcohol-related responses.
Read Full Abstract
Request Reprint E-Mail: K.Houben@maastrichtuniversity.nl