Austerity plus recovery plus curtailed treatment equals more mutual aid is  the formula for ways out of dependence in the post-credit crunch 2010s. But with  only 12-step groups, the offer is limited. What will it take for a  cognitive-behavioural alternative to flourish in England was the question for  this pilot project.
Summary The SMART Recovery pilot  project was funded by the English Department of Health for two years from April  2008. SMART is an  acronym for 'Self Management and Recovery Training'. As applied to drinking, it  offers a recovery and relapse prevention aid which like Alcoholics Anonymous  (AA) relies on mutual support in small groups of people recovering from drink  problems, but instead of being based on the 12 steps, sees addiction as a  learned behaviour which it seeks to unlearn using cognitive-behavioural  principles. The US-originated system  focuses on:
• building and maintaining motivation to abstain;
• coping with urges;
• managing thoughts, feelings and behaviour; and
• balancing momentary and enduring satisfactions.
• building and maintaining motivation to abstain;
• coping with urges;
• managing thoughts, feelings and behaviour; and
• balancing momentary and enduring satisfactions.
SMART Recovery UK  (see web site) and the  national charity Alcohol Concern  joined together to establish the SMART Recovery project to  pilot the model at six sites in England. It aimed to test whether non 12-step  mutual aid can flourish and become self-sustaining with a view to facilitating  take-up by areas across England. Such a development would in particular redress  the lack of aftercare following formal treatment for patients uncomfortable with  AA, but might also offer a recovery and relapse prevention option in its own  right.
The featured evaluation report (for full report click title of this entry;  for summary click here) was one of the project's outputs. It was not  intended to quantify drinking outcomes but to determine whether the project's  methods had proved a feasible way to establish new mutual aid groups of these  kinds in the six areas, and whether these developments were acceptable to  alcohol treatment/help services and potential group members. The researchers  relied largely on analysing documents related to the project, observing its  work, and on the views of those involved, gathered via interviews, focus groups,  and questionnaires. 
> > > > Read More
> > > > Read More
 
