![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVjleMAidCYKbJxwxXsUx9zKRwoJ6Smk_XCbnhdnHkrKEyF61EHrHR-p1Fxbe-6q2mA6n0hTGtsVZmeTZCecd2QE3yuJw1rTC6in1xec9gANsACh6IWvZb53PQCLjr3fKvUhUUIZU5Xmad/s1600/a+addiction.gif)
We would like to thank Dr Lanzmann-Petithory for her comments [1] on our age–period–cohort analyses about heavier drinking [2]. As she devoted most of the space to alcohol and health in general and the French paradox in particular, we would like to start our rejoinder with a remark on that topic. The role of wine in the French paradox is still controversial. It is now known that a large part of this seeming paradox can be explained by the coding practices of French doctors, who have been shown to overuse unspecific codes for cardiovascular disease, so-called ‘garbage codes’, artificially lowering the prevalence of ischaemic heart disease [3, 4]. As for the general impact of alcohol on health, most analyses come to the conclusion that it is mostly detrimental [e.g. [5]; the latest results of the Global Burden of Diseases study (GBD): http://www.healthmetricsandevaluation.org/gbd/research/project/global-burden-diseases-injuries-and-risk-factors-study-2010].
> > > Read More