Aims

To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.

For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.

___________________________________________

Monday, March 12, 2007

Determining client need in a multi-state fetal alcohol syndrome consortium: from training to practice

Behavioral and Brain Functions 2007, 3:10
15 February 2007





Suzanne Christopher1 , E-mail: suzanne@montana.edu
Tim Dunnagan
1 ,
George Haynes
1 and
Lili Stiff
2

1Department of Health and Human Development, Herrick Hall, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
2Department of Health and Human Development, Haley Road, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA


Abstract

Background

A multi-state consortium was developed in the US to conduct baseline data collection and intervention research on fetal alcohol syndrome. Each state employed support specialists whose job it was to reduce or eliminate alcohol consumption in women who were at high risk for drinking alcohol during their pregnancy. The purpose of this paper is to report how support specialists in three primarily rural/frontier states were trained to assess client need and how client need was actually assessed in the field.

Methods

A qualitative process evaluation was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with state staff involved in support specialist training and consortium activities and the support specialists themselves. Inductive analyses were conducted with interview data.

Results

Need determination varied by state and for one state within the state. How support specialists were trained to assess need and how need was assessed in the field was mostly congruent.

Conclusion

Process evaluation is an effective method for providing practical and useful answers to questions that cannot be answered by outcome evaluation alone.

Full Text (PDF)