An international website dedicated to providing current information on news, reports, publications,and peer-reviewed research articles concerning alcoholism and alcohol-related problems throughout the world. Postings are provided by international contributors who monitor news, publications and research findings in their country, geographical region or program area of interest. All postings are entered without editorial or contributor opinion or comment.
Aims
To support the free and open dissemination of research findings and information on alcoholism and alcohol-related problems. To encourage open access to peer-reviewed articles free for all to view.
For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.
___________________________________________
For full versions of posted research articles readers are encouraged to email requests for "electronic reprints" (text file, PDF files, FAX copies) to the corresponding or lead author, who is highlighted in the posting.
___________________________________________
Friday, November 13, 2009
Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial of Dissemination Strategies of an Online Quality Improvement Programme for Alcohol-related Disorders
This project investigated different dissemination strategies of an online quality improvement programme for alcohol-related disorders into routine care in South Baden and South Württemberg in Germany.
Two thousand six hundred and forty-seven practitioners were asked to take part in the study, and it was possible to randomize 112 (4%) practices. There were no significant differences concerning the use of the system between the groups: 41.9% of the GPs in the first group, 42.9% in the second group and 44.4% in the control group used the system. In terms of only the system users, 55.6% of the GPs in the first group, 33.3% in the second group and 8.3% in the control group used the system six times or more (P = 0.019). Diagnostic assessments made by the GPs in the groups differed substantially: 72.2% of diagnoses in the first group were correct, while this figure lay at 69.7% in the second group and 36.4% in the control group (P = 0.034)
No effect of the additional training on the primary outcome (acceptance) was identified, but on two of the secondary outcomes. Further cost-effectiveness studies should investigate whether the effort involved in providing training additionally to the system is justifiable.
Read Full Abstract
Request Reprint E-Mail: daniela.ruf@uniklinik-freiburg.de
___________________________________________