Field methodologies offer a unique opportunity to collect ecologically valid data on alcohol use and its associated problems within natural drinking environments. However, limitations in follow-up data collection methods have left unanswered questions regarding the psychometric properties of field-based measures.
The aim of the current study is to evaluate the reliability of self-report data collected in a naturally occurring environment – as indexed by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) – compared to self-report data obtained through an innovative web-based follow-up procedure.
Individuals recruited outside of bars (N = 170; mean age = 21; range 18–32) provided a BAC sample and completed a self-administered survey packet that included the AUDIT. BAC feedback was provided anonymously through a dedicated web page. Upon sign in, follow-up participants (n = 89; 52%) were again asked to complete the AUDIT before receiving their BAC feedback.
Reliability analyses demonstrated that AUDIT scores – both continuous and dichotomized at the standard cut-point – were stable across field- and web-based administrations.
These results suggest that self-report data obtained from acutely intoxicated individuals in naturally occurring environments are reliable when compared to web-based data obtained after a brief follow-up interval.
Furthermore, the results demonstrate the feasibility, utility, and potential of integrating field methods and web-based data collection procedures.
Request Reprint E-Mail: mcelio1@binghamton.edu